Gameloft reviews about "people"

Low salary and chaotic management.

- Salary can be a bit lower than the market

- The base salary is on the lower side of the market. The trade-off is that the jobs are more specialized, - In recent years, due to competitive cost, this studio has the chance to grow and scale up. However, it is met with some problems: + Complexity in budgeting, want to find great talent to expand but doesnt have the money + Old teams and employees got shafted in favor of new talents (especially expats) + Management side are not ready for a scale up + Lots of Inefficiency and incompetency issues + There are multiple factions - If you dislike Gen AI, the manager side in this studio tries to push the AI agenda despite HQ legal team's warning about legal risk and multiple failure from past implementation attempts. - There is a pressure to deliver good revenue while having less people, a.k.a "lean team". - If you are a programmer, depending on the project you will need to OT a few times per week. But the company itself doesn't encourage OT and prefers you to complete your job within standard working hour.

- maybe a bit less paid in the industry but I've seen worse - no option for full time home-office

It’s fine to start in an entry-level role to break into the industry, but as you move on, climbing to senior positions becomes tougher (especially for women) and the pay often lags behind the workload, with most people handling two or three roles at once

Small salaries and no increments for long time employees

When there is low office performance caused by poor management, the subordinates are the ones who get sacrificed. Management will take their team’s work, claim it as their own, and remove the people who actually perform well. They will always try to save themselves, and HR often protects them, creating a kind of management dynasty that keeps the same people in power regardless of merit. The back-and-forth progression becomes a complete disaster because everyone is busy claiming credit instead of solving the real problems. As a result, when a compelling idea emerges, everyone rushes to contribute, which only prolongs execution due to the constant back-and-forth.