Toxic work culture - Senior Quality Assurance Engineer Zelis Employee Review

1.0
23 Jan 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company offered strong infrastructure, perks, and benefits.

Cons

I worked as a Senior Quality Assurance Engineer at Zelis for 1.5 years. While the company offered strong infrastructure, perks, and benefits, the work culture in the EE team was toxic. The leadership's authoritarian style lacked key skills, with a focus on rules over essential practices like knowledge transfer and Scrum processes. I faced favoritism, where the QA team was blamed for issues, and developers took credit for successes. This created a demotivating atmosphere. Additionally, there was a lack of diversity in top management, with many coming from TCS, making it feel more like working at TCS than a product-based company. I'm grateful to have moved on to a more supportive environment

avatar
Zelis Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback with us here on Glassdoor - we value every voice. We believe that our mission to make a real difference in healthcare translates over to our culture. We are proud to have the best talent in the industry-- passionate and caring at their core. As a company who strives to be a more diverse, inclusive, and equitable organization for our associates, our clients, and our community, we are deeply disappointed to hear about your experience. We urge you to reach out to us directly to discuss your concerns.

Explore other reviews about Zelis

5.0
29 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I 've been with Zelis for more than 3 years, and it's been a great place to build a career. One of the biggest benefits is the flexibility. Working remotely has allowed me to maintain a healthy work-life balance, which is incredibly important because my family is my top priority. I've always felt trusted to manage my work while still being present for the moments that matter most outside of work. The company has created an environment where employees are empowered to do their jobs without unnecessary micromanagement. Leadership encourages collaboration, and I've had opportunities to learn, grow, and contribute in meaningful ways. The culture is supportive, and I've enjoyed working alongside talented colleagues who genuinely care about helping each other succeed.

Cons

Like any growing organization, there are times when processes and priorities change, which can take some adjustment. Clear communication during periods of change is always appreciated, but overall, these have been manageable and haven't taken away from my positive experience.

2.0
13 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good work/life balance, generous PTO

Cons

• Excessive management layers: There are too many layers of management, many of which seem focused on self-preservation rather than supporting the team. This creates unnecessary bureaucracy, leaving employees bogged down with low-value tasks and corporate checkboxes instead of meaningful work. • Outdated technology and resistance to innovation: The tech stack is significantly outdated, and there is a clear resistance to adopting modern solutions. For example, I was penalized for incorporating AI into development work, despite other teams being encouraged to use tools like ChatGPT for less impactful tasks. Opportunities to implement cost-saving, AI-driven solutions were dismissed without proper consideration. • Unsustainable expectations for advancement: Promotions appear to be reserved only for top performers who are willing to prioritize work above all else. The expectation to “eat, sleep, and breathe” the job creates an unhealthy work-life balance and limits growth opportunities for otherwise strong contributors.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All