10,15, 20, 25, 30 years it doesn't matter, your still just a number!!! - CNC Machinist Weatherford Employee Review

1.0
25 Sept 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Weatherford believes in lots of safety meetings, the equipment is decent, and most of the other machinist are good guys to work with. Good benefits. Good vacation policy. Next to impossible to get fired.

Cons

Weatherford's communication is horrible! As machinist you are kept in the dark on everything. If you are looking for advancement, LOOK elsewhere, because you will find none here! Once they see you are a good machinist you will retire there. The only way to advance in the shop, is to kiss butt or be a female with a cute one! Rules are constantly being changed to benefit whoever is in charge that day. We do have a bunch of safety meetings , but they don't mean anything, when production is suffering for safety's sake, safety is out the window and everyone turns a blind eye toward it. Management talks about fatigue as a safety hazard all the time and today we were informed that it will be mandatory for the machinist to work 7 days a week for the better part of the next month! They are hiring short service employees right out of high school with no experience to run very dangerous and expensive equipment! This is an accident waiting to happen. We have no maintenance to speak of on the machines and they expect us to work magic with crappy tooling, when you can find any! Inspection is a joke and they have as many indirect labor people (secratarys) employed there as direct labor (machinist) . There are too many chiefs and not enough Indians. You will never hear of any good things you do for management, but they have no problem informing you of the bad. It doesn't matter how much you do,it is never good enough! Our facility is nothing more than a glorified training facility for young guys, they come get a good machining education from very knowledgable experienced machinist and then leave after a year or two when Weatherford will not pay them what they are worth. Supervisors are not the brightest bulbs in the pack either, most of the older hands know more than both of them put together.

Explore other reviews about Weatherford

5.0
8 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good exposure to offshore operations, strong team environment and opportunities to develop technical and problem-solving skills in the field.

Cons

Fast-paced environment with frequent changes in priorities and processes, which can sometimes impact consistency and planning.

1.0
15 Aug 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It semi pays the bills.

Cons

The company’s current leadership approach is unsustainable and is eroding both employee trust and operational quality. The Executive Leadership Team (ELT) has prioritized short-term profits over long-term stability, relying on temporary fixes like biannual layoffs to meet quarterly targets. This constant cycle of cuts creates instability, damages morale, and signals a lack of strategic vision for the future. Without a clear plan for sustainable growth, the company risks continued decline. Human Resources (HR) policies are undermining performance and engagement. The rigid, arbitrary pay scales and grades artificially cap employee earning potential, regardless of contribution. Raises are determined primarily by attendance rather than actual performance, and increases are applied uniformly across the board. High performers at the top of their pay range receive minimal adjustments, which sends the message that excellence is not truly valued. These policies directly limit motivation and retention. The Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) team has implemented regulations that appear to be driven more by internal authority than actual safety improvements. When questioned, the justification is often no more than “because that’s the rule we decided on.” Without clear evidence of safety benefits, these measures feel like unnecessary obstacles that reduce efficiency without adding measurable protection. The decision to outsource significant portions of work to India may have reduced costs on paper, but it has also caused a sharp decline in service quality. This deterioration impacts both internal operations and the customer experience. Cost savings cannot justify the long-term damage caused by diminished quality. Unless leadership addresses these issues directly and decisively, the company will continue to lose both talent and competitive standing.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All