Sadly, driving my high loyalty and engagement down, starting to fall out of love - Senior Manager Vanguard Employee Review

3.0
7 Sept 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Corporate structure (owned by clients) -Firm mission and investment philosophy -Benefits, particularly PTO -Great people, team environment -Strategic thinking / direction of firm (advice) -Product and service lineup (although could be broader)

Cons

-Doesn’t value the workforce like the past, particularly the people who have the knowledge and have driven results for years -Too much deadwood and 20+ year bureaucrats or inexperienced new leaders from rotational programs in senior positions -Expecting more of people, yet not changing compensation enough to reflect that -Being pennywise / pound foolish with spending, particularly on tech, CEOs relentless push for expense reduction is concerning, and people don’t feel like they can challenge

Explore other reviews about Vanguard

5.0
11 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working here has been an excellent experience. The role offers meaningful responsibilities, exposure to complex matters, and opportunities to collaborate with talented colleagues. Management is supportive, and there’s a strong emphasis on professional development and proactive planning. The culture values integrity and teamwork, making it a rewarding environment for anyone looking to advance.

Cons

While the role is rewarding, the workload can be demanding during peak periods, requiring strong time management skills. Processes are still evolving as the organization formalizes procedures, so adaptability is essential. Additionally, visibility into cross-department initiatives can be limited unless you proactively seek out opportunities to connect.

1.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay was competitive. Great Benefits. Worked with Incredible talent. Retirement benefits are insanely good.

Cons

The environment is characterized by a high degree of toxicity and a lack of work-life balance. Middle management prioritizes their own individual promotion tracks over employee well-being, often leading to unsustainable workloads and professional burnout. A primary concern is the performance rating system, which utilizes a rigid bell curve methodology. This structure frequently results in the alienation of hard working employees; individuals are assigned unfavorable review scores primarily to balance budgetary requirements for top-performer bonuses rather than based on merit. Once an employee is labeled with a low rating, it initiates a cycle of intense scrutiny that is nearly impossible to overcome, as the performance expectations become disproportionately high and unrealistic. This broken system has led to significant turnover, as there is a pervasive sense that being targeted for failure is inevitable. Furthermore, managers are often pressured into downgrading high-quality employee ratings to meet predetermined distribution quotas. Ultimately, the relentless accumulation of tasks and the resulting extreme stress outweigh the financial compensation, making the overall experience detrimental to one's professional and personal health.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All