Not a place for engineers that like engineering - Mechanical Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

1.0
6 Apr 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Looks great on a resume because of the company name

Cons

Pay rate is entirely offset by cost of living There is zero possibility to take initiative because these ideas WILL be shot down by upper level engineers Quality of work is a completely concept - schedule is king. If you produce crap, it will be happily excepted if it is on time (even if it doesn't do what it's supposed to do) "That's the way things are around here" is this company's effective motto I've never seen coworkers treat each other so rudely, disrespectfully, and unprofessionally. I've heard of people at other companies get let go for behavior that is tolerated here as "That's just how he is".

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
29 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All