Northrop has Assimilated (read: Steamrolled) Xetron - Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

2.0
12 Jun 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Site has a legacy of solving hard problems in short time frames. Opportunities to sometimes work on important, quick-turn programs. Pay is good for the area. 1 week training per year. Tuition reimbursement for Masters (beware handcuffs) A few good senior technical staff remain (chained down because they are grandfathered into the discontinued pension). Networked Corporate Licensing means you can usually get a license for most tools.

Cons

*Corporate ownership does not mix with local heritage of quick-react capabilities. - Urgent, quick-turn programs are forced to follow corporate processes. -- Corporate machine takes 2 weeks to do anything. -- Most tools / processes from 1990. Strict adherence required. -- Buying any material requires a chain of 4 people, one day of your time to hound them, and takes minimum of 2 weeks to receive. *Local directors have lost respect of most technical staff. - Local directors sugar-coat all communication to the extent that it's a bad joke. - Local management culture prevents real-time negative feedback down the stack. - Negative feedback up the stack is not tolerated. Warning first, then retribution. * Site exists within a humans-in-seats division. - Local site lumped into a division focused on providing bodies in gov't-owned cubicles, for the lowest cost per hour. - Local site's labor rates affect division's bill rates. - This means that local site's facilities are just overhead, and will be neglected. - This means that employees are strongly encouraged to always be billable. -- no process improvement budget -- no internal tool development budget *Persistent Engineering Slow Brain Drain. - There are other local small defense companies persistently poaching anybody with any experience. Management's sugar-coating exacerbates the problem. *Zero feedback from staffing capability to sales expectations. - Local sales force and site management are strongly incentivized to sell, sell, sell! - Recruiting team is asked to fill or back-fill positions, to keep up with sales. This task is impossible, due to qualifications, clearance, tight technical labor market. - As a consequence, there is more work than can be completed. Anyone with any experience is stretched thin to cover as many projects as possible. - Management strategy has been to hire as many interns as possible, since qualified engineers are scarce. Gotta bill the hours somehow, or director's bonus suffers. * Beware the following pay-related stuff: - 401(k) match doesn't vest for 3 years for new hires. - part of 401(k) match withheld to end of calendar year (probably to help cash flow) - golden handcuffs: tuition reimbursement, signing bonus, relocation expenses

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
29 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great well-ordered work environment with consistent work.

Cons

Work can be boring based on team.

1.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All