Great Career-Starter for the Engineer - Lead, Engineer Leidos Employee Review

3.0
6 Jul 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Co-workers are very professional as there is zero tolerance for anything less. This is great place to learn how to do your job well as the pace of work is slow compared to corporate america. I learned more from my coworkers in one year than in 5 years at other companies. Anyone average or slightly below exits the company in less than a year due to management's creative ways to ensure a certain level of performance. This means you almost NEVER have to worry about incompetence. Its truly a unique work environment.

Cons

There is almost no upward mobility and a lack of recognition for individual performance other than you get to continue working there. Managers are working managers with minimal time to do anything other than their own job. There is no career development. Goal setting is 'go-through-the-motions'. Groups operate in information silos with little incentive to integrate such that there is a lot of redundancy. Management's take on turn-over is people come and go. Even if you are the best ever, don't expect anyone to care when you leave.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
22 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work from home

Cons

There is few opportunities to promote

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All