Losing their edge - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

2.0
22 Aug 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Reasonable work life balance - immediate supervisors are good folks to work with pay is OK

Cons

Most positions are period of performance (POP) meaning if the contract is lost you lose your job; no bench and a very passive re-assignment search staff meaning you have to find your next job pretty much by yourself and almost every job now requires TS/SCI . with Poly which is not something you can get or Leidos will provide - they do not grow their employees into a next job or career path. Plus if you work on the customer site you are quickly forgotten by middle and senior management. They have another merger going on which will make things worse in the short term.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
22 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work from home

Cons

There is few opportunities to promote

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All