employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Inter-American Development Bank

Is this your company?

great potential but not the place to spend a whole career - Intern Inter-American Development Bank Employee Review

3.0
16 Mar 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Access to experts in their respective fields, high level government officials, and emerging sectors. Ability to network with international experts and carry out high level projects. Work was extremely interesting and contributed to the development of latin countries on issues not always addressed at other private sector banks or environmental institutions. Ability of the bank to put large amounts of money behind projects. High profile of the bank in Latin America lent to credibility of projects and scope of work that could be planned and accomplished. DC is a very international city and contributed to the general awareness of IDB staff.

Cons

The bank is very slow in approving projects and has a matrix type of organizational structure that is extremely difficult to manage. Every decision has to be approved by someone at the sector level and at the country level. The bank carries out a lot of work done by private sector banks, and may be crowding out their work, therefore it is difficult to find the positive, development angle to some of the work ongoing. There is a competition with the World Bank that is not helpful to staff who could otherwise benefit from more knowledge sharing between the two.

Explore other reviews about Inter-American Development Bank

5.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Excellent benefits, culture and opportunity to make a real impact.

Cons

There is bureaucracy across the organization. Vertical career progression can be slow.

2.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work with elitist Spanish speaking Latin Americans who are xenophobic for people that speak other languages, who have processes, paper pushing and career progression as major objective, not real development outcomes (eradicate extreme poverty & improve quality of life in LAC).

Cons

Bureaucracy. Outdated development agency. Abusive to and misclassifying contractors. People who don’t know what they are doing or talking about. Delivers trash projects and pulls impoverished countries further into national debt. Technocratic and too much focus on metrics, not impoverished people’s lived experience.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All