GTS: Horrific culture. Salary discrepancies. Just don't work there. - Project Manager/Account Manager IBM Employee Review

2.0
2 Mar 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of online learning available on "Your Learning". Unlimited opportunity to work with multi-cultural teams (virtually, not physically). If you start as a Graduate, the salary is good to begin with. Lots of Women in IT events and lots of LGBT+ support/community. Ability to manage own time is very good - very autonomous IF you get the right project/manager.

Cons

Shocking culture that comes down from the top. Their main focus is on short-term financial success without considering the impact on their workforce or the client. They say "client comes first" but I have never seen IBM encourage this behaviour internally, what they really mean is "bring in the money first, then Client comes second". Financial gain is so important to them that it encouraged to bend accounting rules as much as possible, even if it means a loss in the future - as long as they can get the gain now. Senior management bark down the phone at people and you're made to feel guilty if you can't attend certain calls (on Saturdays...). Employees don't take responsibility for their actions. This is not out of not-wanting to be responsible and own actions, it is out of fear of the repocussions should something go wrong. There is absolutely no movement for progression or promotion (on GTS side, anyway). Yes, it's a good starting salary for a Graduate, however by the end of the 2yr Grad scheme you will be earning less than the market value compared to your non-IBM peers - they say they compare your salary to a PMR aka Market Value, yet this PMR hasn't been updated in years and is different for men vs women. Immediate-management don't have the time to actually support their team in career development, as they have a full-time job to do and being a people manager is just an additional task on the side. Finally, they're off-shoring everything. They have a 60/20/20 vision aka 60% resource far-shore (India), 20% near-shore (Slovakia/Bratislava) and 20% on-shore (UK). Not only do remote colleagues not have the skills to step-into the shoes of those they are replacing in the UK (and by replacement I mean made-redundant), but the cultures don't support each other. In the UK, employees work long-hours until the job is done. In India, colleagues don't know how to think outside of a process or list of instructions for e.g. if something goes wrong and the way around it isn't on the process list then they will just stop and not do anything, they won't even come back and tell you it's not working. You will be constantly chasing them. In east-Europe, if it's 17.01 they go home. So be prepared to have to work double hard to cater for the slack elsewhere. In addition, the IMI service in India is fairly new, about 3yrs old. This means that the colleague skills are way below-par and still being trained. About 70% of my stress was caused by IMI's inability to complete a job. If you want to work for a company that is all about the business and dollar signs, IBM is for you. If you want a great culture, progression and support - find somewhere else. p.s. There's no free tea/coffee - you even have to pay 25p for hot water. Just to show you how low these guys go to save a buck...

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Relocation bonus and welcoming team

Cons

Very large and corporate at times

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All