Management - Field Operations Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
4 Jun 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Overall they have great benefits.

Cons

When it's busy they dont care about time with family unless you use vacation. They'll run you in the ground and are always short handed. A few people have the whole department on their back. It's really stressful. Management doesn't care but when they hire you they'll say other wise. Just because you get your competencies done doesn't mean you'll get a raise. If you're not on a project offshore you'll just be bouncing around with no consistency. Land sucks. They'll want you to edit your DOT hours. Take almost 7-10 years to get where you want by that time you'll be so fed up and probably find something better. Halliburton was once a great company but Management is bringing it down.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture is great. Lots of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Company doesn't have work from home option.

1.0
18 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All