Good pay but bad leadership. - FRAC Equipment Operator Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
26 Sept 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It was good because I didn't have any experience in the industry and they paid for me to get a CDL. I was paid 12 an hour for 40 hours a week in a 5 week class. Nice. Then the pay went to 12.90 once I had my CDL. On sites you can get bonuses if it is done without any safety violations and everything is perfect. Got paid for a almost 3 hour bus ride to work which is crazy. Then 3 hours back. For some it is a pro working 100 hours a week.

Cons

A lot of the people are total jerks and not very well educated. A lot of male rape jokes. They would NEVER know what the work schedule would be so its impossible to have a consistent home life. Sometimes supervisors want you to do illegal things with the log book. If you don't they won't forget.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture is great. Lots of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Company doesn't have work from home option.

1.0
18 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All