A large company with a very personal touch. - Associate Technical Professional Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
5 Sept 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great benefits and great pay. Friendly atmosphere where coworkers will work with you when you have questions or concerns about your projects. Management tends to be very open. There is rarely a time that I have felt bored or unneeded. I have generally always been busy or training. Management encourages training and advancement in education, and the company will pay/reimburse you for your efforts.

Cons

Moving within the company can be very difficult, especially if management wants you in a particular position or location. As with most large companies, it can also be hard to stand out from the crowd, but at the same time, there isn't a strong sense of competition, so this isn't a big issue. The biggest problem for me, being in my mid 20s, was location. Duncan is a small town with little to do, so while I have few complaints about the job itself, it was not uncommon for me to be bored out of my mind, especially during the work week.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture is great. Lots of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Company doesn't have work from home option.

1.0
18 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All