Great Place to Work - Software Development Engineer III (SDEIII) GoDaddy Employee Review

5.0
25 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great culture with excellent work-life balance - Supportive coworkers and managers who champion your career goals - Growing company with good RSU grants and ESPP options - Excellent health insurance coverage, including Wellness Days - Remote-first post-COVID - Continuous DEI programs into 2025

Cons

- Multiple rounds of layoffs since I joined: one company-wide and one departmental

avatar
GoDaddy Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback and sharing your experience with us. We understand and respect that there can be hard feelings during layoffs and that it impacts each individual differently. We value your feedback about your experience; thank you for sharing it with us.

Explore other reviews about GoDaddy

5.0
16 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great company to work for. Annual bonus, ESPP, annual equity. The comppany really cares abuot its employees.

Cons

No cons come to mind

1.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. Many talented, hardworking employees genuinely cared about helping customers and supporting one another. I gained valuable experience in customer service, website consulting, digital marketing, project management, and cross-functional collaboration. My coworkers consistently went above and beyond despite increasing demands and shrinking resources.

Cons

High turnover, declining morale, and a culture that increasingly asked employees to do more with less. Over the years, benefits and employee perks were gradually reduced while workloads and expectations continued to grow. Many employees took on responsibilities well beyond their job descriptions, including training, coaching, mentoring, quality review, side-by-sides, and leadership functions without corresponding compensation, title changes, or advancement opportunities. Career growth often felt unclear and inconsistent, leaving many employees feeling that hard work and additional responsibility were not rewarded. Leadership frequently emphasized that employees were replaceable rather than investing in retention, development, and institutional knowledge. This created an environment where many experienced and highly capable employees felt undervalued, disengaged, and ultimately chose to leave. Many female employees expressed frustration with what they perceived as inconsistent promotion practices. It was common to see highly capable women taking on additional responsibilities such as training, mentoring, coaching, quality review, and leadership functions without formal advancement, while others appeared to move into leadership roles more quickly. Whether intentional or not, this created a perception that advancement opportunities were not always based on contribution, performance, or demonstrated leadership. The company often spoke about valuing employees while simultaneously reducing benefits, eliminating perks, increasing workloads, and expecting employees to absorb additional responsibilities. Over time, the gap between leadership messaging and employee experience became increasingly difficult to ignore.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All