Pros
Exposure to well-known clients and a variety of industries Many capable and supportive people at junior and mid levels Fast-paced environment that allows individuals to develop resilience and learn quickly
Cons
Operational processes lack consistency across teams, which creates confusion, duplication of work, and frequent reprioritisation Planning, reporting, and finance systems remain fragmented and rely heavily on manual spreadsheets rather than integrated tools Reporting tends to be retrospective rather than used as a live mechanism for improving performance or course-correcting The culture often feels reactive rather than strategic, with frequent firefighting and unclear ownership of decisions Workloads regularly exceed realistic resourcing levels, placing pressure on teams to compensate for structural gaps Leadership capability and communication standards appear inconsistent across the organisation From a broader organisational perspective, the company appears to be going through structural changes following investment and attempts to scale. However, the way these changes are communicated and managed raises questions about leadership maturity. For an organisation that positions itself as people-centric, the gap between messaging and leadership behaviour can be noticeable. As the company continues to grow following investment, addressing these leadership and operational gaps will likely be important for retaining experienced talent.