Don't start your career here - Engineer Blue Origin Employee Review

2.0
23 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Bold vision -Employees are friendly, but no different from other workplaces I've experienced -You get to work on rockets

Cons

-Scaling way too quickly -Increasingly “Kool-Aid” Culture -Employees treated like pawns Blue Origin is my first engineering job out of school. If I were to assess the composition of the company, I’d say most senior employees and upper-level managers are ex-aerospace from other companies (Rockedyne, Boeing, ULA, etc.). Blue Origin offers an opportunity for these people to “do it right” by developing products at a new company without process pitfalls and overhead that characterize old aerospace. Arrogance abounds, as most of these individuals have very strong opinions of how the company should be run (perhaps justified). Consequently, it seems like most decisions have a battle for control or hidden agenda implicitly attached. I’ve struggled to find individuals at the company I consider to be honorable leaders, and a lot of them seem to be leaving. As a new employee, you get assigned to a project, and usually there’s a person on the team that Blue wants you to “emulate.” That person assigns you work. This is typical of how industry functions, and if you pair well with the team then there’s nothing wrong with the system. The problem is Blue is scaling so quickly that they pay little to no respect to career history and ambitions of employees. Unless you see and know exactly who you want to be at the company, you can end up in a corner where your job is to take the work off the plate of more senior employees without clear definition of how this helps you get where you want to go (because what you want doesn’t matter). Since the company is scaling so quickly, it’s really tough to find people without an agenda to seek out for career development advice. I’ve had 2 (perhaps going on 3) functional managers in the last year just from company restructuring, not job-performance related. For first time students out of school, I think you are be better off starting at a company like Aerojet, Boeing, ULA, or Lockheed. These companies may be “old aerospace” but they will give you a clear impression of what a functioning aerospace company looks like. Moreover, they have well-established and vetted career development and training programs to help you figure out what you actually want to do and how to get there. The one exception to this I can think of is if you're dead set on working on liquid rocket engines; if that is the case then Blue or SpaceX may be the right place. Blue will likely be here down the road and will still need people if you decide to jump ship from another company someday. Perhaps I’m naive, but friends who work at other aerospace companies in the Seattle area seem more satisfied with their careers right now, even though my job at Blue may “sound cooler”.

Explore other reviews about Blue Origin

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good team to work with. No complaints.

Cons

No cons at this point.

2.0
19 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

4 weeks of PTO, good benefits, free drinks and snacks available at all locations.

Cons

Leadership is inconsistent and often incompetent, company is very segmentalized and each group operates to different goals and schedules, poor communication with other parts of the company and with leadership. There is an overarching Yes-men mentality amongst leadership, and they often are just aiming to not be the group to be to blame for delays or failures. Personal growth is limited and widely ranges between different groups, there are areas where people see regular raises and promotions, while the majority seems to be told there are freezes or that they will be put in for next cycle. Pay has fallen behind, in the past they used to pay well and above the industry standard, but have not kept pace. Hours can be very long, again dependent on your group, some people may enjoy things like work from home or flexible schedules, but the majority are asked to work long hours and even support roles that could be remote are forced to be on site, despite a lack of space for the number of employees. I moved desks locations and buildings 6 times in 3 years. Re-orgs happen every 6 months, and create significant instability within the company, but rarely bring positive improvements. Good talent is not rewarded, and leaving quickly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All