Banner: not a bad place to earn a paycheck from - Human Resources Director Banner Health Employee Review

5.0
28 Aug 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They truly care about patient care and, to some extent, employee engagement. There is opportunity to grow and to learn. There are a lot of smart, caring people working there and it's a pleasure to work with them. Also, I felt it was a reputablee company that I felt pretty good about working at. It was my first foray into the healthcare industry and I'm definitely sold on making healthcare a career for the duration. It has its challenges but certainly has its rewards.

Cons

Now that I'm out, I see that it's really not that bad. One thing they're bad at is leadership development. They put people in management positions before they're ready and their direct reports certainly pay for it.

Explore other reviews about Banner Health

5.0
5 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My leadership team is wonderful

Cons

Benefits could be better- better 401k match

avatar
Banner Health Response
6mo
We appreciate you taking the time to leave a review. Thank you for being a Banner Health team member.
1.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This review isn't about the pros of working for Banner Medical Group.

Cons

The last couple of years with BMG, many current and former leaders have encountered ongoing challenges related to the senior leadership team's (Ops Directors and above) behavior and accountability. Expectations and disciplinary actions are not applied consistently, and when disciplinary actions are applied, it is retaliatory for speaking up about these inconsistencies. This has created a culture of distrust and fear between the clinic leadership teams and Ops Directors/Senior Ops Directors. It also goes against Banner's "If you see something, say something" campaign. The HR team has also contributed to the growing fear and distrust by not following their own guidelines, and by the ERC's showing their bias against leaders through their tone of voice when talking with you, baseless accusations against leadership, and approving corrective actions that are vague and missing specific details of the incident that someone is being written up for. It also raises concerns amongst clinic leaders when multiple leaders bring forward the same concerns and issues about Ops Directors over a lengthy period of time and we're told, "we couldn't corroborate your concerns." And when multiple leaders provide ample evidence (Chronological Management Records, Teams chats, email chains, etc.) to disprove these false accusations and you're still placed into corrective action, the word corruption starts to become applicable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All