A good company to work for - Director Banner Health Employee Review

4.0
7 Mar 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Dedicated staff who believe strongly in excellent patient care. Patient care and patient safety drives all decisions. A large system enables employees to broaden their skill sets and learn different parts of healthcare. Each facility/hospital has its own culture. Competitive salaries and benefit packages. Retention of employees is still a focus despite this economy. A continuous improvement mentality is prevelant in most parts of the organization.

Cons

Some highly tenured staff have an entitlement mentality. When cuts are needed due to budget constraints a small minority of staff pout, instead of understanding that this is a different economy than it was 3 years ago (it seemed to be the highly tenured staff who were the most vocal.) Lack of a rigorous leadership development program, which is a problem because many leaders are home grown and could really use some revised leadership competencies. An IT platform that seems antiquated for the size and scope of the company.

Explore other reviews about Banner Health

5.0
5 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My leadership team is wonderful

Cons

Benefits could be better- better 401k match

avatar
Banner Health Response
6mo
We appreciate you taking the time to leave a review. Thank you for being a Banner Health team member.
1.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This review isn't about the pros of working for Banner Medical Group.

Cons

The last couple of years with BMG, many current and former leaders have encountered ongoing challenges related to the senior leadership team's (Ops Directors and above) behavior and accountability. Expectations and disciplinary actions are not applied consistently, and when disciplinary actions are applied, it is retaliatory for speaking up about these inconsistencies. This has created a culture of distrust and fear between the clinic leadership teams and Ops Directors/Senior Ops Directors. It also goes against Banner's "If you see something, say something" campaign. The HR team has also contributed to the growing fear and distrust by not following their own guidelines, and by the ERC's showing their bias against leaders through their tone of voice when talking with you, baseless accusations against leadership, and approving corrective actions that are vague and missing specific details of the incident that someone is being written up for. It also raises concerns amongst clinic leaders when multiple leaders bring forward the same concerns and issues about Ops Directors over a lengthy period of time and we're told, "we couldn't corroborate your concerns." And when multiple leaders provide ample evidence (Chronological Management Records, Teams chats, email chains, etc.) to disprove these false accusations and you're still placed into corrective action, the word corruption starts to become applicable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All