30% positive business outlook
Pros
1. Work life balance is encouraged. 2. Pay and benefits is great 3. Fair performance reviews 4. Awesome Culture Overall a Unicorn Bio-tech Start up company!
Cons
- can wear many hats as the company is rapidly building.
Pros
Pay and benefits are great. I like how the recruiters came to me first and saw potential in me.
Cons
Management is terrible. Our supervisor tends to micro-manage a lot. The recruiter promised me that there's growth but as soon as I started, I was at entry level which is discouraging. Another review mentioned about the blame game and that is true in my department. I'm not allowed to perform some functionalities in my job which doesn't makes sense at all.
Pros
Competitive Pay and benefits are a plus
Cons
Inexperienced Managers make the work harder,
Pros
Met some of the nicest and capable people. Worked on a team the valued research and experimentation from the lab to the compute infrastructure. Good pay and benefits.
Cons
Company and product was (and still is) run by some real amateurs. A good assay does not make for a good product. Leadership, especially the CSO, are all over the map and provide no real direction or demonstrate any decision making skills. Very reactive and "ambitious" in their timelines, projections, etc. Tons of churn in the middle-management layer.
Pros
On site cafeteria and fitness center, decent pay and benefits. Awesome colleagues who aren't in management.
Cons
Would give you tasks way above your level to complete and then completely disregard it during promotion and pay reviews. No empathy from management even though empathy is one of their core values. Did not care about family events in your personal life, would make you feel guilty for choosing family over work. I had big hopes and still love their mission, but daily work life is nothing like they sold when being recruited. I would not recommend this company to anybody.
Pros
The pay and benefit are good. Google food and facility.
Cons
Amateur-level science and product. There are many manager-wannabes without adequate scientific training and experience. They can be very arrogant and condescending but, unfortunately, also hold some tribal knowledge. The company is on a very tight timeline, so there is no time to solve issues, which the amateurs created, that will undoubtedly backfire in the future.
Pros
Money - they pay well for the market. Mission - if the company succeeds, the mission is honorable
Cons
They are dishonest and will scapegoat you for not streamlining their chaos. They will renege on parts of your agreed offer acceptance as "business needs", pretending to misunderstand your agreement. Benefits are hard to navigate and difficult to use. They hold you to unestablished KPIs. They offer unlimited pto but will definitely limit it. Micromanage. Do not respect your expertise. Usurp your ideas, and then accuse you of not contributing or pulling your weight - and cut you out of the associated projects. They are diverse but also racist, and definitely do not treat everyone equally.
Pros
- Insurance - Free food on campus - Flexible schedule
Cons
- It is hard to rise to the ranks, especially in departments that are overlooked by higher-ups. - Management heavily relies on their employees to carry the weight of projects while taking the credit. - Promotions are very limiting and it's frustrating taking the responsibilities of a supervisor without adequate pay.
Pros
Good pay & benefits, work/life balance
Cons
I'm all for empathy, understanding, & respect, but not if that behavior slows productivity, feedback, and innovation. Culture inteview weeds out excellent candidates based on unrealistic statistics
Pros
Pay was competitive and the facilities are great. The product itself is genuinely meaningful and easy to get behind. I worked alongside some few talented, good-hearted people — unfortunately, many of them eventually left due to the culture issues described below.
Cons
There are way to many people who are extremely toxic and self serving there. Whether it was within my own team or interacting with others many were only looking out for their own teams interest. Toxic people are left alone by management due to perceived need or viewed as hard to replace. This resulted in multiple good people leaving to avoid it. Instead of dealing with it they let it fester for years. This creates the sense for these people that they are untouchable because in a sense they are. Many I would consider instances of harassment. We went through multiple rounds of layoffs during my time there and they crippled the morale of the company. Made a bit more doom and gloom and it was hard to bounce back from. Health insurance was sub par compared to other companies and industries.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.