Unstable and getting worse - Anonymous employee iPipeline Employee Review

2.0
13 Aug 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people, at least those not in management. Most of the other employees are very friendly and will try to help each other, especially knowing they might need the favor returned. The lunches and employee programs are a very nice perk. The fact that the company has a dragon boat team is a very nice touch as is the free fruit in the lunch room. The onsite mini-gym and bathroom with a shower is also a great perk. Neville, the director who is a shining exception to the management negatives I will list later.

Cons

Chronic understaffing. Team resourcing is determined using some fairy tale formula which leads to overwork across the board. Free summer BBQs are nice, but when dozens of employees decide to work through their lunch break instead, it should tell management something. The overseas developers are a just plain bad, especially those who are not iPipeline employees. iPIpeline needs to hire more US developers, especially recent college graduates who are flexible and willing to learn. Support also really needs the budget to add an extra person or two at just about every level. Management (especially at the executive level) is completely focused on profit and does not seem to care at all about individual employees. There is a brain drain in progress where very capable employees, particularly developers, are leaving due to work load and salary. This was never a strong point, put in recent years it seems to be getting worse again. Management seems to also think that people are interchangeable and can be freely shifted from team to team without any impact on productivity. This just isn't the case, especially with the larger and more unique implementations. Giving a project an untrained intern for a month is not going to move the dial; by the time the intern learns anything they are gone. Not enough promotion from within and too many people brought in at the senior or lead level who do not deserve that title. Too much focus on idealized Agile process. I have seen properly executed Agile practices, and I do not believe that iPipeline's client base and business model will allow for proper flow. Listen to the people who have been here for many years for solutions and not outside consultants.

avatar
iPipeline Response
10y
Your comments especially around our services organization are spot on and we have been working hard to increase additional staff. I agree with your college recruit comments 100% and for some reason we have strayed away from this and I will revisit. The only reason we have used offshore resources is that we are behind head count hiring. Also, your comments about pay are not necessarily true, all new hires are paid at market rates in order to hire them and last year we paid raises almost two times industry averages. You have some great ideas I would really appreciate you coming to meet with me. Tim

Explore other reviews about iPipeline

5.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Quality Managers who care. Very good at mentoring and encouraging your career path. The company as a whole sees quality as a priority.

Cons

Townhalls did not celebrate employees and team accomplishments enough. It seemed to be noticed and improving. Executive team seemed to be disconnected from employees at our level. No bonuses. PTO wasn’t as good as other companies.

3.0
22 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Direct relationship with your immediate boss always seemed to be positive impression ; everyone I spoke with. Very flexible schedule. Solid PTO allotment Individual contributors are genuinely putting in good work and making effort to produce. Just spread thin.

Cons

Needlessly top heavy leadership led to think tanks that never produced meaningful change. No succession planning. Always reactive to a layoff or someone quitting. Institutional knowledge is siloed into one or two individuals on each team. Insanely low pay Low comp for market. Pay is incompatible with level of skill or contribution. Everyone gets roughly the same annual increase. Punitive RTO policy that overreaches on who’s included for a hybrid model. your in office time will be spent on virtual meetings. Feel like it’s intended to justify spending money on a new HQ office, and “updates” to other locations.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All