Glorified staffing agency - Software Engineer Version 1 Employee Review

1.0
9 Oct 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Charitable giving / social responsibility. Quarterly bonus, rather than yearly.

Cons

(Prefacing my negatives with I work for Version 1 through an acquisition of another consultancy firm. I have then been working for a client by myself for nearly 4 years. Nothing changed from the point that Version 1 bought over that original firm, I still kept working for my client) Isolation. I have been working for 4 years in a team for a client by myself. I have little to no interaction with Version 1. They are happy though, because they are getting paid for me. I can't think of anything that Version 1 has done to make me feel welcome or included as a part of the company. Zero training, development or growth. I have been asking for technical training for years, and ignored at every step. Boggles my mind that there is not more of a drive to want to train or skill up staff. This business model is basically "hire people, send them to another company and do work for them". Surely it makes sense to train those people, so that more could be commanded for them? Just a timesheet. With no training, growth potential, and no inclusion to the organisation, the leftover feeling is that of being a billable entity. All that matters at the end of the day is that the client pays for me.

Explore other reviews about Version 1

5.0
4 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work with good work culture and amazing leaders

Cons

There are no Cons only Pros

1.0
23 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company has talented individuals in Europe and a solid delivery foundation. • Some strong relationships with Oracle in EMEA. • Opportunity could exist if Version 1 ever gets serious about properly investing in the U.S. market.

Cons

No genuine U.S. presence or strategy. The company is almost unknown in North America, yet leadership expects instant growth without brand support, marketing, or resources. • Promises made, not kept. I was recruited with the understanding that I’d lead U.S. Oracle sales and have a team built around me. None of that ever materialized. • Unrealistic quotas and constant changes. Quota doubled midyear with no additional support or territory. • Leadership dysfunction. Roles, accounts, and territories were reassigned arbitrarily — often to overseas reps unfamiliar with the U.S. market. • Poor alignment with Oracle. Leadership rarely engaged with Oracle’s U.S. executives or partners, leading to lost opportunities and credibility issues. • Micromanagement without accountability. Decisions were made from abroad with little understanding of local dynamics or what it takes to win here.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All