Average - UX Designer Verisk Employee Review

4.0
10 Jan 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

flexible work environment remote work (hybrid) for now

Cons

it's not bad. I feel like the upper management would want all employees to come in to the office and all they care is about cutting cost and save money. I never got a good bonus that reflected my performance. Parking is so expensive. Not a lot of perks.

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Hello, thank you for sharing your experience regarding the work-life balance at Verisk, specifically the flexible, hybrid work environment. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. Additionally, thank you for providing your perspective on leadership and management. Our leadership team is open to feedback and suggestions; this is part of our commitment to learning, caring, and results and a foundation of the way we work. We take your feedback seriously and are committed to addressing concerns about leadership effectiveness. If you have instances you’d like to discuss, please contact your HRBP.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All