Good place to work - Business Support Engineer Verisk Employee Review

5.0
1 Apr 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good people, flexibility, working hours and benefits.

Cons

Unstructured employee training in some areas

avatar
Verisk Response
2y
Hi, thank you for your feedback. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us, specifically how friendly our employees are, our benefits package, and our commitment to work-life flexibility. At Verisk, we hold a deep belief in the power of bringing your whole self to work — allowing you to flourish in an open, inclusive environment. Your acknowledgment of our culture is truly encouraging. If there are any suggestions or further feedback you’d like to share, please feel free to reach out. Additionally, Thank you for sharing your thoughts on career development opportunities at Verisk. We value your insights, as they play a crucial role in helping us enhance our programs and offerings. Career development for our team members is a priority for us, and we are dedicated to providing support, resources, programs, and avenues for growth and advancement. Your feedback provides valuable perspectives that contribute to our ongoing efforts to create a more robust and supportive environment for career development.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All