Squandered Potential - Studio / Resource Manager Thesis Employee Review

1.0
5 Apr 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You're gonna read this everywhere in the reviews for Thesis – the people are the only reason employees stay here. And I'm not talking about leadership or C-Suite, I'm talking about the individuals who make the things in order to get paid. The designers. The writers. The project managers and studio managers and strategists. These were some of the most incredible humans and best coworkers ( and now friends ) I've ever had the opportunity to collaborate with and my loyalty to them was the only reason I stayed as long as I did.

Cons

• Nepotism: The amount of nepotism at Thesis is staggering. I can count at least a handful of individuals in leadership / C-Suite positions that are all there because they were all friends or previously connected somehow, but have close to no experience running a business. Now – plenty of people are successful despite that lack of knowledge, but it’s because they LISTEN. They take advice from people and admit their faults and make changes when necessary and get down on employees’ level. This does not happen here. Concerns are ignored, any kind of accountability attempts are taken personally / badly, and the disconnect between leadership and employees is huge. On one staff call during COVID one of the C-suite individuals commented that ‘you might hear my kid in the background, sorry my au pair is sick today!’ While the rest of us with kids at home struggled to juggle WFH and childcare every. Single. Day. Not everyone ( ie. hardly anyone ) can afford an au pair, especially in the middle of a pandemic. • Thankless / Lack of Opportunity: It's painful how disconnected leadership is from the people who make ( or made ) this agency a success. Thesis was one of the ONLY agencies in Portland that made it through COVID without layoffs or major impacts AND made a huge profit as well. Why? Because of the people making the work. Because of the people who worked long, tireless hours, went above and beyond their job descriptions, and cranked out a shitload of creative / projects. Because those people WANTED to contribute, wanted to double down and make Thesis successful, and dug into the trenches of what WFH while navigating a pandemic was like. Did those people get recognized for it? No. Well, if I guess if you count getting 'a comp day' or a $5 gift card to Starbucks as recognition. Many of those people didn't get promoted, weren't offered growth opportunities, and senior positions were hired on from external candidates despite having wonderful people right in front of them. Thesis rode out a hugely difficult time very comfortably because of the efforts of their employees and those people were taken advantage of. • Over Hiring: Mid-COVID business started to ramp up and we were getting a lot of work, so the knee jerk reaction was to hire. Did we need a few people? Yes. Did we need to go from 120 people to 300+ people? Absolutely not. Concerns were flagged by several people from different departments up to leadership about the impacts of these hiring decisions and SEVERAL different solutions to resourcing needs were offered, but ignored. This was in 2021. Flash forward to present and they're 2 rounds of layoffs in. • Poor / Irresponsible Planning: It's said the new building was paid or partially paid for by an outside source, but still. The optics of laying 120+ people off over less than five months while you build a grandiose new building in slabtown ( and paying rent at the current building ) are bad at best. Several of these people that were laid off moved their entire life to Portland and you're telling me you couldn't have seen that being impacted a few months after they arrived? • DEI / Equity: Thesis touts their attention and commitment to DEI / equity ( and B-Corp ) status, but it doesn’t match with what is actually happening. The internal ERGs ( employee resource groups ) are used as a performative section on the website and not supported at all internally. Anything needed for the ERG ( design, project management, writing, etc ) has to be provided out of employee’s own time ( often after hours ) and they are not compensated or supported for it. They promise to hire BIPOC individuals – and while they’ve made good efforts lately – the lack of representation in senior positions / leadership is striking and anytime anyone tries to hold those in leadership accountable for it they are reprimanded and permanently held back from success / advancement at the company. Leadership prefers to plug their ears and keep walking.

Explore other reviews about Thesis

5.0
3 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Thesis has been an incredible place for me to grow professionally. I've had the opportunity to learn, take on meaningful work, and be supported by some of the most talented and thoughtful people I've worked with. What stands out most to me, though, is the personal care and humanity I experienced during a very difficult period in my life. Both my manager and the CEO went far beyond what I would ever expect from an employer, offering compassion, flexibility, and support that allowed me to take care of myself and my family when I needed it most. I will always be deeply grateful for that.

Cons

Like any organization, there’s always room for growth and improvement. But I’m 100% committed because I believe in the leadership, the people, and the direction we’re heading. There’s a real sense of care and purpose here, and I’m proud to be part of it.

3
1.0
14 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people doing the day-to-day work are the company’s greatest strength and the primary reason many employees continue showing up each day. Teams are filled with talented, hardworking individuals who consistently deliver despite significant organizational challenges.

Cons

Leadership feels increasingly disconnected from the realities of delivery and employee experience, with an overwhelming focus on revenue and margins above all else. At the same time, leadership frequently overcommits to client demands and approves work at unsustainable or negative margins, only to later criticize teams for failing to meet financial targets created by those decisions. Employees are often treated more like interchangeable resources than long-term contributors, resulting in exceptionally high turnover and a constant revolving door of talent. Any meaningful, innovative, or strategically important work is routinely handed to external contractors rather than internal teams. These efforts are often executed in isolation, with little intentional knowledge sharing or investment in growing the capabilities of permanent employees. This creates frustration, limits career growth, and reinforces the perception that internal staff are not trusted with the company’s most important opportunities.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All