Good future and product except bunch of odd man out people - IT Consultant Talend Employee Review

3.0
29 Nov 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Comparison to other open source product the growth and future planning is impressive. 2. Interaction of sales/presales/ps/csa is good. Some times some people bluff without knowing ground reality, stop doing that. 3. customer exposure is great. 4. Travel is plus (take it as cons/pros).

Cons

1. product is highly unstable. If you tell this to customer success/ R&D they dont listen because most of the people come from non talend background. Not their fault. 2. too much diversion into multiple products to en cash on value, but first of all make DI / TC / TBD rock solid. 3. Some people in sales, oh man only talks , no base , just big talks and thats what they get paid for is not it :)

Explore other reviews about Talend

5.0
28 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, colleagues, and products

Cons

Acquisition by Qlik caused major disruptions and drove all existing employees away.

1
4.0
29 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Talend has a great foundation for technical growth with a strong product centered on Talend Studio which generates Java code for data integration using visual drag-and-drop components * Strong Eclipse technology and community are built into Talend Studio * Talend Studio addresses both batch integration (Jobs) and application integration (Routes) * Very rich palette of Components for batch integration Jobs * Generated code for event driven Routes uses Apache Camel which is excellent

Cons

* Poor generated code quality * Generated code for batch Jobs lacks a mature underlying framework (e.g. there is no underlying Spring Batch or equivalent that the generated code uses) * Design palette for Routes is very limited and does not contain most Camel components * Components for Camel Routes are poorly documented * Generated code for both Jobs and Routes is monolithic and not easily extended * Limited re-use and modularity of user designs. There is some, but it is not as robust or manageable as it should be. * Does not make use of modern software frameworks such as Spring. * Very poor tools for authoring SQL

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All