Worst and toxic work environment - Senior Mechanical Project Engineer TARGAN Employee Review

1.0
7 Sept 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The projects they work on are very interesting and it's stuff that's never been done before.

Cons

I got fired from here after 4 months of employment. Because the CEO thought I wasn't management material even though I had no people reporting directly to me. The work environment is super toxic and the CEO randomly comes behind your back when you are working and yells at you out for doing a bad design job while the design is still in process. There is a dog and pony show every 6 months or so to the Big Pharma companies who fund the company. A week before the presentation everyone is running around and spending money like crazy to get stuff done. They have been in business since the past 5-8 years and still have not produced a single product. It's a scam where they keep getting funding with no results and keep publishing senseless patents.

avatar
TARGAN Response
2y
We are disappointed to read about your experience. As we move from start-up to commercialization, we will continue focusing on building an inspiring place to work that is fulfilling for all. Our Human Resources team would appreciate an opportunity to learn more, if you'd be willing. We encourage you to email HR@TARGAN.com so we can connect.

Explore other reviews about TARGAN

5.0
19 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Smart team. Interesting work. Most days here beat the best days at some of my previous employers.

Cons

They treat themselves as a start-up, but I think that moniker should still be there after 10 years. A lack of official project managers leaves for holes in ownership. No Work-for-Home. No interest in adding wfh or hybrid to roles that can have it.

1.0
15 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some individual contributors genuinely care about doing good work, but they rarely stay long enough to make an impact.

Cons

The environment is dominated by favoritism and personal loyalty rather than skill or performance. Promotions go to those who stay close to the CEO, not those who deliver results. Technical decisions are often made by individuals without the necessary expertise, while employees who actually understand the work eventually leave or are laid off. The norm was friends-and-family hiring, creating a closed circle that resists accountability and sidelines qualified contributors. Bullying and behind‑the‑scenes negativity are normalized, making psychological safety nonexistent. HR does not operate as a neutral or protective function. Employees who raise concerns or challenge dysfunctional behavior are labeled as “problems” and pushed out, reinforcing the toxic culture and discouraging transparency. After more than a decade in operation, the company still has not reached profitability and continues to rely on outside funding. This long-term financial instability mirrors the internal dysfunction: a culture that drives away expertise cannot build a sustainable business.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All