Poor pay, no progression - best to avoid - Anonymous employee System C Employee Review

2.0
19 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good coworkers (shame about senior management) OK flexibility (although decreasing, with a deeply disliked announcement that got the reactions removed from future townhalls, because senior management don't want to deal with entirely obvious reactions to their announcements)

Cons

Non-existent career progression - impossible to advance, even into positions that are what you're already doing (each job title has two bands - you can try and wrangle a progression into the top band. If you got told you're in the top band? Tough, that's all the progression you can get, even if the next role up is what you're already doing - you can be doing that for years without getting any acknowledgement or pay increase). The only thing you get for long service is 1 or 2 extra days off, not even a gift voucher! The job family structure assumes a pyramid, with lots of lower-ranked workers and a few higher-ranked ones - when the company has mostly mid-rank and above workers, it's not fit for purpose and doesn't work with the skill-mix the company has. Bad pay, even worse pay increases (sub-inflation for several years, despite taking on multiple new responsibilities), and no relationship between pay and position (the breadth of experience - from a few years to multiple decades - under the same title makes it obvious that "salary" and "position" are entirely unlinked, and an announced pay review has never been finished/released). Multiple companies awkwardly glued together - you might have to work with multiple, completely unrelated, products, repos, tech-stacks etc., and switch between them several times a day, having to remember all the wriggly differences between them every time. Will you get paid more for this? Of course not, even though it's multiple different roles in one.

avatar
System C Response
1mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We’re sorry to hear that your experience hasn’t met expectations, particularly around pay and career progression—these are areas we know matter deeply to our colleagues. On your point about recent announcements, we want to clarify that the discussion referenced was about evolving our hybrid working approach. This includes encouraging office-based colleagues to spend a minimum of two days per week in the office, supporting quarterly face-to-face time between colleagues and managers, and creating opportunities for remote colleagues to connect in person on a quarterly basis. Our intent is to balance flexibility with connection, collaboration, and wellbeing. Regarding town halls, we have a duty of care to all colleagues who present and participate. Following feedback that a very small number of individuals were generating a high volume of reactions, our CEO acknowledged this and we made the decision to pause and review how reactions are used. The aim is to find a better way to maintain open feedback while ensuring a respectful and supportive environment for everyone. We also hear your concerns around career progression and how our current structures are working in practice. This is an area we are actively reviewing, and we recognise there is more to do. If you’re open to it, I would genuinely welcome the opportunity to speak with you directly—your perspective could help shape improvements and new ideas. We remain committed to building a fair, transparent and inclusive environment where colleagues can grow and feel valued. Thank you again for sharing your views. Tanya - CHRO

Explore other reviews about System C

3.0
3 Jul 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hybrid working Get to work in offices periodically in different UK locations

Cons

Not many social opportunities/events to attend

2
1.0
29 Oct 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only pro is the remote / hybrid working.

Cons

I could write a lot on this, but the two biggest challenges within the company are: 1. Disorganized processes and slow decision making. Operations felt chaotic, more like the downside of a start-up than the upside. Decisions moved slowly, inefficiencies were everywhere and few people seemed empowered or accountable to fix them. The technology, infrastructure, and ways of working often felt outdated and unnecessarily manual. 2. A People team lacking credibility and capability. From leadership down, the People function appeared out of depth. Initiatives such as career frameworks and progression tools being introduced felt more like surface level exercises than meaningful strategies. Despite the talk of being “people focused,” the execution of any initiatives lacked clarity, consistency and genuine understanding of what employees actually need.

5
avatar
System C Response
5mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. I’m pleased our remote / hybrid working suited you, but I’m sorry that other aspects of your time did not meet your expectations. We recognise that some of our processes and tools have been too manual and slow. As we integrate our group of companies into one organisation, we’re investing in clearer processes, better systems and sharper ownership so decisions move faster. You’ve also raised concerns about our People team and career development. Our career frameworks are currently in the design and build phase to create greater transparency, with a communicated deadline of the end of our financial year. Alongside this, we’ve introduced Development Planning, Squiggly Careers training and toolkits, and a mentoring programme to support colleagues with their career development. We appreciate your honesty and will use this feedback as we continue to improve. Tanya
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All