Rating it 5 star so that the site doesn't take down mu review - Software Development Engineer (SDE) Safe Security Employee Review

5.0
18 Dec 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Intense work environment 2. Great work life balance, just that you can forget life, literally a life going experience. 3. You get to work 16h a day, 7 days a work week. It's a great opportunity for you to hang around in the Saturday and sunday meeting after a great night out. 4. Compensation is good but the work you deliver should be greater to greatest 5. Very competitive work environment, mostly everyone is self surrounded and better trust yourself. 6. You get a MAC.

Cons

1. Nothing I can think off. 2. Everything I can think off. 3. More than what we deliver to the society as a product or value adding solution, it is mostly concentrated about funding and money. 4. Building demo ready codes just to attract sales, that might be taken down in the future (uncertainty). 5. Very unreliable architecture, which when pointed, you will be asked to close your Oesophagus when. 6. You get the opportunity to explore all the ways to get away from your social life. 7. Some good people + some drastically opposite(friendly) people.

Explore other reviews about Safe Security

5.0
21 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Genuinely category-defining work in cyber risk - from CRQ, TPRM to CTEM — not marketing fluff, real outcomes for CISOs. Fast-paced, intellectually stimulating environment where good ideas win regardless of who they come from. Leadership is accessible, decisive, and transparent about where the company is headed and why.

Cons

Moving fast means priorities can shift; comfort with ambiguity is a real requirement, not a cliché. The bar is high and the pace is relentless; not the right fit for someone looking to coast.

6
1.0
3 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some individual engineers/other employees were genuinely helpful and kind.

Cons

The company somehow has both heavy processes and constant urgency, which produces chaos instead of structure. Leadership frequently calls the organization a “family” and claims to be transparent, but communication is selective and decisions happen behind closed doors. Engineering culture is defined by constant overwork and subtle pressure to offload tasks onto others just to stay afloat. You spend as much time defending your workload and deadlines as you do actually building anything. The CEO’s mindset feels stuck in 2015—there are frequent “Ferrari” metaphors, “work harder” rhetoric, and at one point, even a story shared in a surprisingly celebratory tone about a former employee who worked himself into a heart attack. This fits a broader pattern: a strong emphasis on minimizing short-term costs rather than making decisions with long-term stability or scalability in mind, which raises questions about the company’s longer-term direction. A significant number of US engineers had already been quitting because the workload and expectations were identical across regions while the compensation didn’t come close to matching US cost of living; unlike in India, labor protections and broader opportunities made leaving a more realistic option. The US engineering layoffs were ultimately explained as a reaction to several managers quitting, yet they came directly on the heels of this wave of voluntary departures. This also matters when reading reviews, since employee experiences and incentives can differ significantly by region.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All