24x7 Availability for Customers Required - Customer Success Manager (CSM) Safe Security Employee Review

5.0
22 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As a CSM from almost three years , company is obsessed with customer first rule and they do not compromise with it, and for an individual in the CSM team, sometimes is very tough to cater customer's requests though engineering is working at the speed of light, not sure how many of you know but they release a new feature every week which is unheard of in the industry , and by default it does not come well for CSMs to quickly learn and deliver to the customer. Training is there but sometimes if falls short. Overall company culture is good, you will learn alot if you are ready too. Flexible holidays no check in checkout tracking.

Cons

Too much on the desk to complete in very short time and keeping CSM vs the customer ration that is insane hence it effects the quality of the delivery , company needs to map down accounts and CSM ration carefully, as of now they are sailing well but its not sustainable as we move forward.

Explore other reviews about Safe Security

5.0
21 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Genuinely category-defining work in cyber risk - from CRQ, TPRM to CTEM — not marketing fluff, real outcomes for CISOs. Fast-paced, intellectually stimulating environment where good ideas win regardless of who they come from. Leadership is accessible, decisive, and transparent about where the company is headed and why.

Cons

Moving fast means priorities can shift; comfort with ambiguity is a real requirement, not a cliché. The bar is high and the pace is relentless; not the right fit for someone looking to coast.

6
1.0
3 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some individual engineers/other employees were genuinely helpful and kind.

Cons

The company somehow has both heavy processes and constant urgency, which produces chaos instead of structure. Leadership frequently calls the organization a “family” and claims to be transparent, but communication is selective and decisions happen behind closed doors. Engineering culture is defined by constant overwork and subtle pressure to offload tasks onto others just to stay afloat. You spend as much time defending your workload and deadlines as you do actually building anything. The CEO’s mindset feels stuck in 2015—there are frequent “Ferrari” metaphors, “work harder” rhetoric, and at one point, even a story shared in a surprisingly celebratory tone about a former employee who worked himself into a heart attack. This fits a broader pattern: a strong emphasis on minimizing short-term costs rather than making decisions with long-term stability or scalability in mind, which raises questions about the company’s longer-term direction. A significant number of US engineers had already been quitting because the workload and expectations were identical across regions while the compensation didn’t come close to matching US cost of living; unlike in India, labor protections and broader opportunities made leaving a more realistic option. The US engineering layoffs were ultimately explained as a reaction to several managers quitting, yet they came directly on the heels of this wave of voluntary departures. This also matters when reading reviews, since employee experiences and incentives can differ significantly by region.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All