Great people, poor leadership - Anonymous employee Quizlet Employee Review

2.0
22 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A great group of warm, talented coworkers and middle managers who genuinely care about you as people, which made it worth staying despite bad leadership. It’s energizing to work for a product that’s well-known in education and helps millions of students learn.

Cons

The past 3+ years have been full of instability at the leadership level, and very little transparency about it, including multiple CEO changes, a revolving door of VPs, and a strategy that’s constantly changing, The engineering org was destroyed earlier this year due to poor leadership, and the product and marketing orgs were destroyed this month during the layoffs that impacted a large chunk of the teams. Struggling to see any hope of long-term success now that 50% of the talent is gone (and likely many more soon due to lack of trust and morale) and the company is relying on AI for product strategy/development.

Explore other reviews about Quizlet

5.0
13 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great people, good work culture, professional, flexible,

Cons

Hard to fully integrate as a contractor

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There was a community of talented, caring individuals (ICs and middle management) who supported each other and were passionate about shipping quality features for Quizlet's users.

Cons

- There has been no strategy for years. If there ever is one, it veers mid-quarter. Work assignments veer accordingly. Then leadership blames anyone but themselves when productivity tanks. - The CEO and his army of VPs brought "Amazon/Google accountability" to engineering, and want to drive out what they see as a bunch of low performers. They demonstrate zero ability to distinguish between "low performer" and "mvp". So they drove out most of the mvps. That's in consumer experience engineering btw. There is a smoking crater where the Data & AI org used to be. - The CPO did nothing for years except kill the ideas of his product managers. No ideas, no direction, no support. - Leadership has massive fomo about alleged AI productivity. They measure it with poorly correlated metrics like commits, PRs, lines of code written etc. They keep deciding they haven't replaced enough "low performers" with AI. They’re desperate to drive two or three new features a week, and so they have driven the company into the ground.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All