employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Procore Technologies

Engaged employer

Micromanagement, Burnout, and Poorly Executed Changes—A Frustrating Experience - ERP integration support specialist Procore Technologies Employee Review

1.0
27 Feb 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The health insurance benefits are excellent. - Working from home provides great flexibility and work-life balance.

Cons

- Significant changes over the past two years have negatively impacted this role and team. At one point, more than half the team left within six months due to job dissatisfaction. - Morale has steadily declined, and employee retention appears to be driven more by the lack of internal career growth opportunities rather than job satisfaction. - The role has shifted from a Tier 2 support position to more of a frontline role, yet the complexity of the work remains at a Tier 2 level. This has increased workload and pressure without appropriate adjustments in resources or expectations. - There is a pervasive culture of micromanagement, making it difficult to work autonomously or feel trusted in decision-making. - Higher-level management appears disconnected from the realities of this role. Their decisions suggest a lack of understanding of ERP Integration Support responsibilities, leading to changes that negatively affect both efficiency and job satisfaction. - Burnout is a widespread issue, yet when employees express their struggles, the only solution offered is a handful of free therapy sessions through Modern Health. While mental health resources are valuable, they do not address the root problem: an unsustainable workload and a company culture that prioritizes performance metrics over employee well-being. If nearly everyone is reporting burnout, the issue isn’t how employees manage stress—it’s the way the company is operating. - Procore has a terrible track record when it comes to implementing changes effectively. Over the past two years, I have not seen a single product or process change that was executed smoothly. Leadership consistently fails to anticipate challenges or proactively plan for potential obstacles. Instead, changes are rolled out in a reactive, "throw it at the wall and see what sticks" manner, more reminiscent of a startup than a mature company. Given the number of experienced leaders in place, there should be better foresight, planning, and accountability for major changes. - Constructive feedback from employees is often dismissed, and in some cases, those who voice concerns are met with punitive measures, such as Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs), limiting their ability to transition into other roles within the company. - Immediate managers are generally supportive and understanding, but they have limited ability to advocate for their teams due to upper management’s resistance to feedback and unwillingness to adjust course.

Explore other reviews about Procore Technologies

5.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Having been with Levelset for several years prior to the acquisition, the long-term transition into Procore was incredibly smooth. The company culture is genuinely fantastic, and the people are some of the best I’ve ever worked with. Management fosters a highly collaborative environment with a strong emphasis on quality. I truly loved the day-to-day environment and the team camaraderie throughout my entire tenure.

Cons

The only downside was related to global budget shifting. Ultimately, my contractor agreement couldn't be extended due to a corporate push toward more cost-effective overseas hires rather than maintaining the US-based contract budget.

1.0
25 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Total compensation is not bad

Cons

The company has been stuck in a cycle of layoffs, reorganizations, and sudden priority shifts for years. When headcount reductions don’t go far enough, “performance” becomes the fallback justification for exits, even for people who were previously considered strong contributors. Turnover is high across multiple teams, and it’s common to see groups lose several people in a short period of time. A recurring pattern is cutting higher-cost roles and then rebuilding similar functions in lower-cost regions, often framed as “global expansion” or “strategic growth.” In practice, it feels more like cost-cutting for optics rather than a real investment in long-term capability. This contributes to instability and a sense that employees are interchangeable. There is a widespread belief inside the company that going to HR can put your job at risk. Multiple employees across different teams have experienced negative *consequences* shortly after raising concerns, and this perception has become part of the culture. People openly warn each other not to involve HR as it will only make things worse. Trust in HR and leadership is extremely low, and feedback mechanisms are performative rather than genuinely a pulse check on employees. I know of leaders who have attempted to de-anonymize anonymous surveys. Operationally, coordination across time zones and locations is poorly managed, which slows down even simple decisions and adds friction to day-to-day work. Workload expectations often exceed staffing levels, and priorities shift faster than teams can realistically execute, leading to burnout and frustration. The company used to have a much stronger culture, but over the last few years it has deteriorated significantly. Many employees who were once proud to work here now describe it as a place they’re trying to leave, not grow with.

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All