A truly horrible place to work - Anonymous employee Pie Insurance Employee Review

1.0
4 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros to list

Cons

- Micromanaged on a daily basis. No autonomy to make decisions on your own - Unmanageable workload. Constantly understaffed and having more added to your plate. But compensation stays the same - Upper management has no idea what they’re doing - The same “leaders” that have led them into bad debt and failed to make them profitable are the ones coming up with “solutions” to hit profitability - The CEO asks new hires to leave positive glass door reviews when they have only worked there for a handful of weeks - Your department will have its best year ever, but you won’t get a raise or a bonus

Explore other reviews about Pie Insurance

5.0
23 Oct 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pie is mission-driven and focused on modernizing an outdated industry, giving employees the chance to build products that genuinely help small businesses. The organization embraces modern technology and design thinking, encouraging innovation, experimentation, and new ideas. Leadership is accessible and human, and the company invests in connection and community even in a remote environment.

Cons

Because Pie is growing fast, change is constant—if you need rigid structure or slow, steady routines, it may feel overwhelming at times.

2
3.0
26 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked with many talented, thoughtful engineers who cared about building reliable systems and supporting each other. The remote environment was generally workable, and there were meaningful technical problems to solve across backend services, APIs, data quality, production support, and customer-facing workflows. I also appreciated opportunities to take ownership, mentor teammates, and work on systems that had real operational impact.

Cons

Priorities and organizational direction could shift quickly, which sometimes made it harder to plan long-term technical work or understand how career growth would be evaluated. Communication around larger company changes could have been clearer and more timely. Career progression, role expectations, and decision-making sometimes felt uneven across teams.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All