employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

New Era Life Insurance

Is this your company?

Pros and Cons of why you shouldn't work here - Anonymous employee New Era Life Insurance Employee Review

3.0
5 Aug 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get a small (tiny) bonus on Dr. Chen's birthday and at Christmas you get a small bonus. And this doesn't include your annual increase.

Cons

New Era uses an agency to handle direct hires. They misrepresented me and I started with a very low salary. Then I was advised that my bonuses would make up for my $15K deficit. I was lied to Supposed to be flex time but isn't - I was lied to about the hours I would work. We're an insurance company but it has the worst insurance. Managers are abusive and HR supports them. You can take vacation only if your manager decides it works for them. Emergency time off counts against you.

Explore other reviews about New Era Life Insurance

5.0
1 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

PTO, salary, work environment, comrade

Cons

Some dont know what they're doing. Some had been there too long and won't adapt to change.

2.0
24 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Supportive and collaborative coworkers - Casual workplace culture - Private cubicle workspace - Hybrid work schedule (4 days in office, 1 WFH day)

Cons

- Cubicle workspace had no windows - Bright yellow lighting created an unpleasant office environment - Time tracking felt excessive and highly micromanaged. Clock-in and clock-out locations were monitored to ensure employees were physically at their cubicles, and employees would be called out if they clocked in while still entering the floor. - Office space is outdated - No separate sick day policy - employees were required to use PTO when ill - Barely any company culture besides holiday events on Thanksgiving and Christmas - Compensation was significantly below market value for the role and responsibilities - starting salary was $45K with only an increase to $47k after 2 years - Limited opportunities for salary growth and advancement - My role is typically split between 2 positions, but I was doing both - Management communication style often felt discouraging and not constructive, with feedback sometimes delivered in a way that felt undermining rather than supportive - Limited accountability from management when issues arose, and concerns were often redirected back onto employees rather than addressed collaboratively - Occasional unprofessional workplace dynamics at the leadership level created a tense and uncomfortable environment in shared office areas and meetings - PTO requests submitted well in advance and occasional requests to adjust the single weekly WFH were sometimes met with reluctance or a dismissive tone, making flexibility feel limited - Communication from management sometimes included expectations or commitments that weren’t followed through, leading to additional work being completed without clear follow-up, review, or publication - There was a disconnect between expected strategy and day-to-day decision-making, limiting the ability to implement data-driven recommendations - Research and reporting were often requested and completed, insights weren’t consistently incorporated into final decisions, even when supported by performance data or industry best practices - Recommendations were often not acknowledged creating inefficiencies and repeated work

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All