Underpaid technician with fancy title - Postbac NIH Employee Review

1.0
25 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Time off to interview, I got into the school I wanted

Cons

Heavily saddled with repetitive technician work. PI and others lied about what my responsibilities would be in the laboratory but by the time I arrived it was too late to leave without delaying graduate school applications. It was very clear our job as postbacs was to be technicians willing to do tedious labor for long hours at low pay for a letter of recommendation. PIs regularly abuse postbacs. 0 accountability. Administration will never side with a 2 year postbac over a tenured faculty member regardless of the offense Lack of mentorship, Baltimore is too far from Bethesda to take advantage of the NIH graduate school resources. My PI offered me next to nothing to help me with my career goals. Treated like technicians not trainees Extremely political. Science came second to the agenda of people in power. Your experience will be highly dependent on your PI. Vet them thoroughly because once you join you are stuck until you apply to school. Avoid labs with alot of postbacs because they are using them for cheap labor. Look into RA programs at your school of choice before considering the NIH.

Explore other reviews about NIH

5.0
26 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not stressful, science based, not profit.

Cons

Slow processes, too many meetings.

4.0
25 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with the some of the smartest scientists and clinicians in the world. So many learning opportunities. Kind patients. Allowed time to care for patients as there is no pressure of quotas by health insurance.

Cons

Nursing management can be verbally abusive with frequent retaliation and intimidation. As most older nurses have worked there for most of their career, they are dismissive of new perspectives and resistant to evidence-based practice.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All