Junior Developers: DON’T WORK HERE! - Software Engineer Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
12 Feb 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They provide free healthcare, but you get this at most companies. No perks here makeup for how awful they make your lives.

Cons

As a junior, if you deal with imposter syndrome and/or anxiety, these people prey on it, they reinforce your negative beliefs, tell you you’re not made out for being a developer- something you are passionate about and worked hard to earn your degree(s) in. I have never had a lower self esteem and worse mental health as I did working in MasterCard as a young software engineer. It was mandatory for All members of the team to join a ridiculous amount of meetings they did not gain value from. Engineers were also expected to deliver well a lot of work, within a sprint, which they were forced to do outside of working hours, weekends, holidays etc. If you take a sick day you were bullied over it unless the manager or scrum master were the ones who were sick. Poor work life balance, you can be working 12hr shifts ( or longer if on call, my longest days were 16hr,and no overtime pay ) - On-call rota has you on shift way too regularly, leading to many weekends and nights affected- especially since you will be working very late most nights anyway. - Nightmarish scrum master who openly targets and humiliates engineers in daily standups, which is ignored by manager, as this harassment causes more work to be done by engineers in their free time. - Sprint retros include targeted bullying. It was a traumatic experience and I regret ever having worked here. The the happiest day of my life was the long awaited last day of work, after the two month notice period.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good people to work with, opportunities for growth

Cons

Tasks may get mundane, otherwise none to speak of

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All