employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Marmalade Game Studio

Engaged employer

Toxic management - Anonymous employee Marmalade Game Studio Employee Review

1.0
12 May 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote first, friendly people, good office space, good benefits.

Cons

Terrible leadership, toxic management practices, and a deeply unhealthy work culture, especially within the marketing department. The Marketing Manager was inexperienced, micromanaging to a fault, and consistently toxic in their approach to leadership. Constructive feedback from the team was not only ignored but often punished, fostering a culture of fear and silencing employees who genuinely cared about improving outcomes. The manager constantly criticised work without any reason, making employees spend extensive hours working on projects that are minimal impact, only to often (98% of the time) make them redo everything again and blame them for the time it took. What’s more alarming is the behavior of the executive leadership. The CEOs demonstrated a complete disregard for employee well-being, despite widespread reports of burnout across the marketing team and other departments. Rather than addressing the root causes of the issue—unreasonable workloads, toxic managers, and lack of support—they placed the burden of recovery entirely on individuals, encouraging burned-out staff to “treat themselves” as if the company had no role in the problem. This level of denial is not only negligent but deeply damaging. Despite repeated professional attempts by the marketing team to raise concerns and seek solutions, no action was taken. In the end, rather than fix the issues, leadership chose to fire nearly the entire marketing team. Only to announce new job openings for those same roles a week before. Marmalade Game Studio may produce great games (thanks to talented developers who never get any credit), but the internal culture is anything but. If you’re considering working here, think twice, especially if you value psychological safety, competent leadership, and basic respect. And if you do work here, a word of advice: do not give them feedback even when they ask. Smile and nod. They don’t care what you have to say. Do yourself a favor and disconnect completely.

avatar
Marmalade Game Studio Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We're genuinely sorry to hear that your time at Marmalade Game Studio was so difficult, particularly in relation to the leadership within the Marketing department and your broader concerns about our company culture. We take allegations of toxic management, burnout, and disregard for feedback extremely seriously. While it's disheartening to read this account, we understand that your perspective reflects a breakdown in trust and communication—something we never want any employee to experience. Over the past year, we've been actively reviewing our leadership practices, feedback mechanisms, and support structures to ensure that all teams feel heard, respected, and valued. This includes conducting anonymous engagement surveys, providing manager coaching, and creating clearer channels for raising concerns safely and constructively. We're committed to fostering a psychologically safe, respectful, and collaborative environment. Feedback, even when critical, is an essential part of that process. While we regret that you did not feel supported during your time with us, we do appreciate you raising these concerns, and they will be taken into serious consideration as we continue to reflect and improve. We wish you all the best in your future endeavors. — Marmalade Game Studio

Explore other reviews about Marmalade Game Studio

1.0
18 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It has some good perks like remote work and health insurance.

Cons

While the company may offer some appealing benefits, my overall experience was negatively impacted by poor management practices and an unhealthy team culture. Leadership relied heavily on micromanagement, which affected both productivity and morale. Work was frequently criticised without clear reasoning, and tasks were often revised in ways that didn’t add meaningful value, creating the sense that appearing busy was prioritised over actual outcomes. There was also a strong reliance on rigid templates for nearly every task. While structure can be useful, this approach limited creativity and professional judgment. Even when guidelines were followed exactly, feedback remained vague or inconsistent, making expectations unclear. Open communication was not encouraged. Suggestions or alternative ideas were typically dismissed, and it became evident that independent thinking was not valued. Efforts to gather feedback often felt superficial, as honest input—especially when related to management—was not well received. It’s also worth noting that there appears to be internal pressure for managers to leave overly positive (5-star) reviews to influence the company’s overall rating, which raises concerns about the authenticity of reviews. Overall, I would not recommend this company to professionals who value autonomy, collaboration, and the opportunity to contribute strategically.

1
2.0
12 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

One could argue that they have good benefits in terms of remote work policy and health insure but that's about it. Good overall professionals and social environment. 80% of the people that work there are actually nice and caring. Some of the best professionals I had the pleasure to work with.

Cons

This company suffers from extreme micro managing that is reflected across the board. There is little to no effort in making sure that there is a clean and healthy environment in the developing process. Deadlines are enforced with an iron hand which then reflects in the inability to listen or care about other people's opinions. In the past the company had the modus operandi of trying to figure out a problem and trying to solve it together. But nowadays it seems that the standard is to just point fingers and make sure to find anyone to blame for a bad layed out scope. You could say that there's a possibility to climb the ladder at Marmalade but there is no ladder in the first place. People have been hired and moved internally on pure vibes with no actual procedures. Most of those ended up in unemployment or reverting back to their previous positions. This is not a creative first company. Prepare to have more responsabilities than the ones you signed up for - because if you don't do them then you're not a team player. It's a very CEO centered company with random demands that may show up at the very end of a certain scope that was up until that point going to deliver. Then when you don't deliver it's on you. "How could you have not forseen this situation? Disapointement".

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All