Pros
The company once genuinely cared about its employees and prioritized their well-being. The main positives were strong internal initiatives and one HR professional who truly advocated for employees, taking the time to get to know people personally and consistently checking in on their well-being.
Cons
When the company decided to change its name, it also lost much of the culture and appeal that once made it a meaningful place to work. Leadership shifted dramatically, where the CEO was once accessible, willing to listen, and present with employees, that openness gave way to disengagement and, at times, public belittling. Over time, several toxic leaders were brought into the organization. While some eventually left, those who remained were rarely held accountable for their behavior, allowing harmful dynamics to persist. Repeated promises of positive change created brief hope, but those moments ultimately proved performative, offering the illusion of progress without meaningful action. Senior leadership has consistently demonstrated a lack of skill and preparedness to effectively manage and support teams. Any leadership training provided appeared to have little impact, as behaviors and management practices failed to improve. Compounding these issues is the striking lack of diversity within senior leadership, which remains deeply concerning and reinforces the sense that the organization has moved away from its stated values.