Director - Director LinkedIn Employee Review

2.0
4 Apr 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some good people with strong values and high integrity. Work life balance and focus on holistic development of staff. Recognizable brand name is still good on the CV.

Cons

I worked at other very high profile Silicon Valley tech companies and found LinkedIn to be very dysfunctional, especially the senior management team. A lot of ego despite the internal propaganda that there isn't. I also found LI to be highly political and not focused on creating the best results. Senior leaders in the US including the CEO and his immediate team simply are not great business people (look at profitability over 10 years - and Lynda, the latest in a long line of gaffes) and focus too much time on their image within the company and externally. I've personally encountered racism and gender bias and when it was raised to HR, some action was taken however nothing ever came of it and no changes were made. To be fair I think there are some great teams at LinkedIn, however these are not the norm and what you will likely experience, should you join LI, is a dysfunctional environment where it is very difficult to get things done and make a substantial impact. Most of the really smart, great men and women I knew at LinkedIn have moved on or are looking to move on.

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
9 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Excellent work life balance and great kind of environment

Cons

There is a lot of pressure on deliverables

4.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

LinkedIn has a strong engineering culture, smart and supportive teammates, and meaningful product impact at a large scale. I have had opportunities to work on complex systems, collaborate with experienced engineers, and learn from cross-functional partners across product, design, data, and infrastructure. The benefits, flexibility, and internal learning resources are also strong.

Cons

Because the organization is large, decision-making can sometimes be slow, and priorities may shift before projects fully mature. Promotion expectations can feel different across teams, and the number of meetings can make it harder to protect deep-focus engineering time. Cross-team ownership is not always as clear as it could be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All