Really bad place to work as an EHS employee - Environmental Health and Safety Specialist L3Harris Employee Review

1.0
27 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Every other Friday off from work and good PTO for EHS employees. Compensation is good.

Cons

Horrible place to work. Disorganized and hostile work environment. Leadership does not support their employees and instead constantly brings them down. They also don’t train people properly or give you the resources needed to be successful. The morale where I work is extremely low and the turnover rates are very high. Employees who have worked there 20-40+ years say the current state of the company is at an all time low in terms of how they operate as a business and how they treat their employees.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
8 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation and benefits package are very strong and attractive

Cons

They doesn't allow remote work

2.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All