Confusing new departments - Product Manager Kubota Tractor Employee Review

3.0
9 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great products, great people to work with, and a great good company culture. Nice work-life balance with inspiring work to do. Nice Japanese coordinators. Great travel opportunities to meet dealers and customers that make our business successful.

Cons

All the new departments are making things messy at the company. Too many new people getting in the way of people getting work done and creating inefficiencies. So many new departments at Kubota North America that nobody knows what they do or what value they bring, but have to be included in everything and prove themselves. Leadership gets an idea that we need something so rather give the work or direction to existing departments, a new department or team just springs up out of nowhere with a director or employee that has to prove themselves and nobody knows what their purpose is.

Explore other reviews about Kubota Tractor

5.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Cares about products, customers and dealers.

Cons

Limited vision transparency from leadership team.

1.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Kubota Tractor Corporation in Grapevine provided exposure to large-scale enterprise operations and complex organizational structures

Cons

My experience at Kubota Tractor Corporation in Grapevine was deeply frustrating and ultimately disappointing. Despite holding a manager role, I had very limited authority over my own team. There was a constant disconnect between title and actual responsibility, which made it difficult to lead effectively or deliver results. Direction often came from multiple layers above, sometimes inconsistently, leaving managers in a position where accountability existed without real control. The organization also appeared to be in a rapid hiring phase without proper workforce planning. Leadership alignment was another major issue. Project expectations and priorities were not clearly or accurately communicated, which created confusion and rework. There seemed to be a gap between leadership perception and on-the-ground execution, particularly in technical areas. “At the director and VP level, there often seemed to be a gap in understanding of the underlying technical realities of the systems and projects being overseen. With the Directors, I felt that I was working with used car salesmen that were given a position of authority and asked to make technical decisions.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All