Great place to work (with * - terms & conditions apply) - Technology Analyst Infosys Employee Review

4.0
15 Sept 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Large company, with lot of name and fame. 2. Training period will be tough but at the same time, fun. 3. Best place to start a career with.

Cons

1. Very less scope to get into development projects, because of which most of the resources will be working on legacy technologies. 2. If you are at Onsite, forget about latest technologies. It always depends on the manager. 3. You will be in situations where you have to choose between onsite or promotion. Promotions happen very rarely at onsite, unless you are a pet to your manager.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
11 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good company to work with

Cons

growth may be factor to consider

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All