ITG: A leading provider of IT governance, risk management and breaking your spirit - Anonymous employee IT Governance Employee Review

2.0
5 Dec 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Well paid for an area like Ely -Some good people working there who really want to make a difference

Cons

How long have you got? -The founder. Never have I met a more impersonal leader. A man not interested in making his company a happy place to work, or taking the time to be personable with his staff/minions. If you want your staff to care about what they do, and turn the fortunes of this company around, create a workplace that demonstrates a consideration for its employees and perhaps you may see results. - Small town business mentality. You know those stereotypes of small town businesses? I.e. one toilet for everyone to share, insipid Wernham Hogg type office layout. All apparent here at ITG. - A HR team with no clue how to handle staff conflicts. - Staff members forced into positions of power, by the ITG Hierarchy, for which they are not professionally trained and are unable to handle the responsibility which comes with it. - Lack of ethnic minorities: One big total white wash. Coincidence? I'm not sure. It's 2018, ITG. Maybe take a step back and look into your hiring policy?

Explore other reviews about IT Governance

3.0
9 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Learned a lot. The job was interesting.

Cons

Disconnect between the US and UK. Senior management understood the business of cybersecurity. But they did not understand business management.

1.0
6 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

While the role was fully remote, this was undermined by negative communication through internal messaging tools. Overall, I would not recommend IT Governance / GRC Solutions to anyone seeking a supportive, well-structured workplace or long-term career development.

Cons

Working at IT Governance / GRC Solutions was a frustrating experience overall. While the company presents itself externally as a professional cyber security organisation, the internal reality did not reflect this. I worked in Marketing, and from summer 2025 there was a lack of clear direction from the CMO. Expectations and priorities changed frequently, making it difficult to do the role effectively or feel confident in performance. Feedback often felt reactive rather than constructive, and there was a persistent sense of blame rather than support, which created ongoing anxiety about job security. Communication from senior leadership lacked transparency. Decisions were often attributed to external ownership without meaningful explanation, leaving teams unclear on strategy or long-term goals. Workloads were consistently unrealistic, with tight deadlines and minimal support. Burnout appeared common, yet concerns raised by staff were rarely addressed in a meaningful way. There were no clear career development opportunities, and progression felt limited unless you were already favoured by management. The culture within Marketing felt particularly difficult. Management style relied heavily on criticism and pressure, which contributed to a toxic environment, low morale, and unnecessary stress. Positive recognition was rare, while criticism was frequent and often poorly delivered.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All