Good place dedicated to a worthy mission who values their employees - Software Developer Health Catalyst Employee Review

5.0
29 Jul 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredible benefits all around. Their employees are number one priority (at least it seems that way). Very fair and competitive compensation. Anyone work remotely.

Cons

A long to commute to an office that's not in a convenient location.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
6y
Thank you for your feedback and for your review. Grateful to hear of the positives you've experienced, including the sense that you as team members are our #1 priority. This is how I feel. Also happy to hear you feel good about our compensation approach and remote flexibility. Thanks also for your feedback on our SLC office location. We're kicking off a review shortly of where we might consider locating starting at the beginning of 2021. We'll solicit input from every SLC team member as part of that process. Also, our education assistance program enables team members to pursue a broadly defined set of educational opportunities, and we encourage every team member to tap into these experiences, working with your manager to enable this to occur. Thank you again for your review and for your contributions to Health Catalyst! Best, Dan

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
30 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
5 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All