Avoid Software Development Team - Senior Software Developer Giacom Employee Review

1.0
21 Oct 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Best CEO Free Coffee, pool and socials Work on Azure technology

Cons

No Pay reviews Feedback is top down only No staff development Expect to work after office hours for free Favouritism and bias Massive Tech Debt that is unimportant Company grows exponentially, but developers remain the same Be careful performance monitored based on the hours you warm your chair Too fast, busy, unproductive & full of interruptions People with authority can intimidate and snap you off

Explore other reviews about Giacom

2.0
5 Oct 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free coffee, free pool table Good stepping stone to gain experience Free PluralSight Staff outings Use up to date technology (Azure)

Cons

Unpaid overtime Very noisy environment Constant interruptions Development machines locked down No salary review Constant meetings Opinionated management Management (software development): Can be opinionated and aggressive Multiple incidents of management making derogatory comments about staff members (within earshot of these staff members) Snap decisions/jumping to conclusions without consulting staff Sexist remarks/comments directed towards male members of staff

8
2.0
21 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There is a strong culture of collaboration among teams and the products are genuinely interesting to work on. People are skilled and supportive, and there is a lot of domain knowledge internally. Under different circumstances it would be a great environment for growth.

Cons

For UK-based developers there is no meaningful path forward. Internal engineering roles are restricted to the Czech Republic, and applications from UK staff are declined on that basis alone. Officially the company may say that roles are open to both locations, but the reality experienced by employees tells a different story. In practice the hiring decisions and internal mobility are overwhelmingly Brno-first, regardless of what is stated publicly. The Czech-first hiring direction appears to be driven by development leadership, and it sends a clear message about where the future technical organisation will sit. Pay reviews for UK staff are minimal, which only adds to the sense that the UK workforce is being deprioritised. The result is that talented and experienced colleagues are leaving because they cannot progress internally. A significant amount of institutional knowledge has already walked out the door. At this point, the only realistic way to move up is to leave.

3
avatar
Giacom Response
4mo
Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback. We recognise how important progression and internal mobility are, particularly for colleagues who have spent time developing their skills here. We’re committed to developing and retaining talent across all our locations, and we continue to review how roles are structured and filled, taking into account team needs, collaboration and long-term development. We also have formal frameworks in place, including MY Time, to support regular conversations around development and career direction.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All