Is it worth staying...? - Information Technology Flagstar Bank Employee Review

3.0
11 Feb 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work hours, expanded work from home environment since the pandemic, excellent pay, great co-workers, diverse hiring, above average benefits (although not as good as they used to be).

Cons

Everything has become about making the shareholders happy: cutting costs, keeping the efficiency ratio high, not backfilling positions, adding more project work to those who choose to remain with the company. On top of this, add management who will schedule meeting after meeting to discuss issues but never take action, only eating more time out of the daily schedule. No more work / life balance in the recent two years.

Explore other reviews about Flagstar Bank

5.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Cons

N/A during my time with the company

2.0
10 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Cons

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All