Good company to work for - while I'm still employed - Anonymous employee Eastman Kodak Employee Review

3.0
14 Oct 2008
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

In these uncertain times, I am grateful for my job with Kodak. It is a big-name employer that provides decent benefits and permits some flexibility in work schedule to allow for a good work/life balance. There are good opportunities for advancement for those high achievers. Morale seems good among my co-workers and we are generally treated with respect by management. Overall, Kodak is a good company to work for and I am proud to say I work here. I only wish I was personally more enthusiastic about my job, but that is due to personal motivation and no fault of my company.

Cons

Uncertain future. There has been ongoing downsizing for the last few years, and there are still layoffs happening that are not communicated very well, which makes remaining employees wary. Despite many layoffs, there still seems to be a top-heavy, bureaucratic management structure. There is a definite lack of communication from management to employees on important issues.

Explore other reviews about Eastman Kodak

5.0
29 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good company and chill work

Cons

Pay is below market levels

2.0
23 Dec 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To be fair, there are smart, capable people here, and the Kodak name still opens doors. But culture and execution matter more than branding. Without clarity, trust, and leadership engagement, even good ideas struggle. I don’t regret the experience as it was instructive. But if you’re considering joining, ask very specific questions about role boundaries, feedback cadence, and how decisions actually get made. Don’t confuse constant motion with real progress.

Cons

Working at Kodak was an eye opening experience in how large, legacy organizations try to reinvent themselves while still dragging along all the habits that made reinvention necessary in the first place. It often felt like roles were constantly shifting, ownership was unclear, and people were operating on instinct rather than alignment. There was a lot of activity, plenty of meetings, and very little agreement on who actually owned what. One colleague in particular somehow ended up doing several jobs at once. That may sound impressive, but in practice it created confusion and friction. When one person tries to be everything, it leaves everyone else in an awkward and unnecessary position.Leadership was mostly absent until it wasn’t. There was also a noticeable top down culture. Certain personalities didn’t invite discussion so much as compliance. Offering alternative viewpoints wasn’t encouraged, and collaboration tended to flow in one direction. Confidence often crossed into condescension, which made an already challenging environment harder than it needed to be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All