Toxic - Anonymous employee Daily Kos Employee Review

1.0
23 Apr 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good PTO, decent benefits, decent pay

Cons

The company is circling the drain. Top management is flailing, with a new plan to save the company introduced every few weeks without any strong explanation for why the latest plan will work. There was a time when working here felt like you were doing something good in the world. Now it just feels like a dumbed-down crappy content-and-petitions mill that's lost any relevance in politics or media. Layoffs the last two years, with nonmanagement workers disproportionately affected. As a former coworker said, it's like a full employment program for lousy managers. Nonmanagers can expect to have their expertise ignored or rejected and to be treated like mindless drones, even or especially when they are more qualified than the people managing them. And it's very common that the nonmanagers are more qualified than the managers. Did I mention the managers are lousy? You can take your pick of useless, toxic, or both.

Explore other reviews about Daily Kos

5.0
14 Oct 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nimble little company with smart people

Cons

Still growing into ourselves and learning how to lead and be accountable.

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Opportunity to work alongside peers who care about the mission.

Cons

The internal culture is a textbook example of performative progressivism. Throughout my career, I have worked for a wide range of standard, mainstream companies that make no public claims about social justice or grassroots values—yet those organizations routinely treated their staff with far more professional dignity, equity, and respect than what is practiced here. It is the least supportive environment I have encountered. Senior management significantly deteriorated. Promotions appeared to be heavily driven by nepotism rather than competence or qualifications, leaving the company with a leadership tier that lacks the experience required to steer the organization. This created a culture of "yes-men" who openly complain about ownership to staff but fail to provide strategic direction or advocate for employees. Innovative ideas from talented staff were routinely dismissed. The company’s internal operations do not reflect its public grassroots branding. Despite hiring dedicated DEI expertise, the organization actively regressed, gutting the very diversity of thought and representation that once made the workforce unique. The current "Frankenstein" state of the platform is the direct result of senior leadership making panic-driven, reactionary choices to cover for poor financial management. These decisions severely damaged labor relations, leaving the union highly dissatisfied and staff morale at an all-time low.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All