Rotten to the core - Product Owner Cyara Employee Review

1.0
16 Sept 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They pay your salary on time.

Cons

Working for Cyara has given me an insight into what life must have been like in the Soviet Union in the late 1980s: Everybody knows they are part of a failing system. Managers give out targets that we all know are meaningless. People pretend to meet those targets by doing pretend work. It's an "AI company" without a data science team. It's a "Silicon Valley" company virtually nobody based in Silicon Valley. It's a "software testing" company whose dev managers don't even believe in testing. Leadership pretend that everything is just fine. Things that should be straightforward, like accessing information on customer product usage, are slowed down, obfuscated, stonewalled, and ultimately avoided because nobody wants know the truth. The signs of imminent collapse are all around. The products are stagnating, leadership is a cosy club who are ignorant to what is actually happening on the ground, and there is no understanding of immanent market challenges. Too much faith is given to the technobabble spouted by pseudo-experts whose eccentricity lend them an air of credibility in the eyes of an all-too-gullible management. Colleagues you were just in meetings with suddenly appear “deactivated” on Slack, gone without a trace. Every product decision now must go through endless committees - even committees to prepare for the committees - in order that decisions can be massaged and any blame spread as thinly as possible, so middle management can avoid being the next to be ‘deactivated’. Nobody wants to be seen to make a decision, because having an opinion, taking a risk, or making a mistake isn’t tolerated. The blame culture is so rife that everything has to be dumbed down into PowerPoint presentations, layered with spin and obfuscation. If you're someone who thrives on communicating and developing complex ideas as part of a team, your talents will be completely wasted here. There are folks who genuinely believe they are doing ‘agile’ but don’t see the irony in the endless committees and bureaucratic processes they require everyone do in order to satisfy their own egos makes Cyara the opposite of agile. The amount of waste is staggering. The HR department is virtually non-existent. People who’ve worked for the company for years are seen in tears around the office because of how bad the atmosphere is. The decline and fall of Cyara is sad, as it was once a great company.

Explore other reviews about Cyara

5.0
27 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Excellent Vision Leading in AI

Cons

Need to to pay attention to old schoolers

1
4.0
23 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At Cyara, true transformation required leadership that was ready to raise the bar, bring clarity to ambiguity, and drive the organization to operate at the standards of a scaled, enterprise-grade business. Rishi Rana was instrumental in this journey. By instilling structure, urgency, and accountability, Rishi Rana challenged teams to move beyond incremental progress and embrace a culture of clear expectations, decisive decision-making, and unwavering ownership. While this level of rigor demanded adaptation, it ultimately fostered focus, discipline, and measurable progress throughout the company. Change of this magnitude is never easy. Transformational leadership means confronting difficult truths, accelerating the pace of work, and holding both individuals and teams to higher standards. The result at Cyara is a stronger, more aligned, and more accountable organization - one that is well-positioned for long-term success. Bringing in leadership of this caliber has been one of the most impactful decisions for Cyara. The foundation built during this period will support the company’s next phase of growth and continue to matter for years to come. With his departure, K1 management is losing a leader who delivered real transformation and set a durable foundation for the next phase of growth. That loss will be felt, and the standard he established will be difficult to replace.

Cons

K1’s leadership transition removes a CEO who was actively driving execution and organizational discipline. This change creates uncertainty around continuity of strategy and the sustained application of the performance standards that were beginning to take hold.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All