Pros
The workflow was subject to frequent changes, making it challenging to maintain consistency.
There appeared to be a preference for hiring cost-effective talent, which sometimes resulted in individuals being promoted to managerial or leadership positions before they had sufficient experience or maturity.
Compensation was not competitive, and additional tasks were often assigned without corresponding adjustments to payment.
While managers participated in high-cost travel opportunities, employees were informed that budget constraints prevented salary increases in line with inflation.
Meetings were not always well-structured, and discussions occasionally veered into unproductive topics, including unverified information or rumors.
Cons
Friendly atmosphere
Being in touch with some nice clients