employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Center for Child Protection

Is this your company?

Meaningful Work, Awful Work Culture - Anonymous Center for Child Protection Employee Review

2.0
16 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Meaningful work that is done at the Center. Can feel fulfilling knowing that you're doing your part in minimizing the trauma for children who come to the Center. Nice colleagues, easy to make connections across departments.

Cons

- Administration and Exec team is completely out of touch with the employees that fall under them. - Little to no room for professional growth. -Communication lacks consistency, and there are disparities across departments. - Work from home is contingent on the supervisor. There's a glaring issue where individuals within departments aren't treated equally, solely based on who their supervisor is. It's like a luck-of-the-draw scenario determining your treatment rather than consistent standards across the board. - HR and Chief of Staff are the same person. She is a nice lady, but it blurs lines between employee support and management direction, leading to conflicts of interest. Employees often hesitate to approach HR with concerns, fearing bias towards management. This setup hinders HR's ability to address issues impartially and maintain a fair workplace atmosphere. - Pending your department, employees are often discouraged from seeking assistance from other departments for tasks. For instance, when assigned a task that could benefit from finance or marketings expertise, supervisors discourage reaching out, suggesting to "learn it yourself." This often leads to wasted time. - There is a significant turnover rate, particularly within clinical departments. Staff concerns are frequently disregarded based on tenure. If a supervisor has been with the company for a certain number of years, they are hesitant to reprimand or dismiss them. This results in a preference for high turnover rather than adapting to modern practices. -The majority of staff members are significantly underpaid considering the volume and caliber of work they contribute. There's a stark contrast between the massive budgets allocated for donor-related events and the reality that many staff members are forced to work second and even third jobs to make ends meet. This discrepancy highlights a concerning imbalance in resource allocation within the organization.

Explore other reviews about Center for Child Protection

5.0
13 Feb 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are nice, there's always room to grow or opportunities to move into new departments, and the work itself really matters. We actually see the children we're helping come through the doors every day. There are also a lot of staff activities and resources to promote connection and mental health wellness, which is helpful considering the heavy content we deal with.

Cons

Child abuse is obviously a hard topic to confront every day. As a non-profit, we also work with community members through the Board of Directors, and there can often be disconnect between their vision and the actual logistics of the day-to-day.

1.0
24 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My direct coworkers were dedicated.

Cons

The problems here are structural and leadership-driven, and they ultimately pushed out experienced staff who had invested heavily in the organization. Pay is inequitable and dishonest. There is no clear pay structure. Some staff are significantly underpaid while others are not, with no transparency or logic to the disparity. We were told things about pay and job roles that turned out to be untrue. When leadership finally admitted the budget was in the negative, they still gave out bonuses to executives. Incoming management was unprofessional and dismissive. A new CDO came in and immediately disregarded everything the team had built, without taking the time to understand any of it. Rather than coming to us with “help me understand how this works so we can improve it”, she came in dismissive and confrontational. This new CDO came in and was rude to everyone, causing moral to drop. And valuable people to leave. She would talk about other teams and talk about our board members and donors. Anytime a concern was raised about the behavior of this manager it was dismissed. Unfortunately they have continues to let this happen severely impacting our donors, team, and new hires. Leadership skills are not prioritized. Managers don’t communicate well with each other. There are no 1-on-1s, so issues never get addressed proactively. Team members regularly take on responsibilities beyond their job descriptions to fill gaps — and that work goes unacknowledged. We raised concerns about staffing gaps multiple times and were not taken seriously. The team was pushed out rather than retained. It became clear that the goal was to displace our team, not develop it. When you raise concerns, disagree with a decision, or simply aren’t a “yes” person, that’s treated as a problem. Good people left because they weren’t valued. I will be leaving not because I want to leave the mission, but because I no longer feel respected or safe staying. The CEO is checked out and HR is not here to protect you and helped the new manager push staff out. Finding ways to purposely put them in uncomfortable positions. This is not a nonprofit I would work for again or. Recommend. DO NOT WORK HERE.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All